hello | wire | gallery | guide | search

 

 Essays

 

Time to Say Goodbye Kofi Annan
     April 1, 2003
     by Martin Schwarz
     Editor, Stories & Texte, Das Autoren-Netzwerk

Since the "coalition of the willing" began its war against Iraq without the approval of the United Nations, the headquarters of the organisation in New York have sunk into deep apathy. Once again the United Nations failed to avoid a conflict, but Kofi Annan now tries to vindicate the legitimation of his organisation by relaunching the "Oil for Food" program for Iraq. Despite the fact that the Iraqi government refused to accept the restart of the program, this new task for Kofi Annan shows clearly which role the United Nations will play in the future: the United Nations will serve as a pure charity organisation. It's clearly the Secretary General's fault that the organisation is consequently led into political insignificance.

If president George W. Bush now is accused of beginning that war without the backing of the United Nations, he was able to do so because the Secretary General acted as a diplomatic dud, who's little more than the pathologist of his own organisation: always too late, never pro-active. When the diplomatic crisis was foreseeable before the war, Kofi Annan never managed to use the diplomatic equipment he has available as Secretary General to slow down the United States' rush to war. Of course, it would have been impossible for him to avoid the outbreak of the attack against Iraq, but at least he could have caused more political problems for the US and clearly had the opportunity to aggravate the moral and diplomatic isolation of the Bush Administration.

But nothing like that happened. Two days before the first bombs hit Baghdad the Secretary General withdrew the weapons inspectors from Iraq . following a "recommendation" by the White House. The US started it pre-emptive war, Kofi Annan started his pre-emptive withdrawal of the weapons inspectors, though he should have waited for the formal approval of that step by the Security Council. Furthermore, this could have been a violation of the UN Charter, which clearly states in Article 100 that "in the performance of their duties the Secretary-General and the staff shall not seek or receive instructions from any government".

If Kofi Annan had acted unilaterally in that case, it would have been a strong signal to the US, that the United Nations are reluctant to allow that war to happen. As Kofi Annan didn't decide so, he showed the White House that he was willing to transfer the monopoly of force to the White House.

But this episode was only the latter in a set of heavy political miscalculations which were possible only with a diplomatic nonstarter like Kofi Annan: when the USA kidnapped large parts of the 12,000-page-long Iraqi weapons report on December 8th 2002 and decided, which parts of it should be delivered to the other members of the Security Council, Kofi Annan suddenly disappeared and didn't protest as strongly as he should have done. But that weapons report was part of the demands of the UN resolution 1441, and therefore the United Nations had the responsibility to decide what happens with it. It was definitely not up to the United States or the Pentagon to interpret the content of the report, but Kofi Annan let it happen.

Now Kofi Annan has admitted in an interview with the New York Times that he didn't realize the inevitability of a war until four weeks ago and explained that with his experience, from time to time a military build-up has to be done to secure peace. That's ridiculous, and nothing more than naive. Surrounding Iraq with approximately 250,000 soldiers of the little "coalition of the willing" had to end in a war. Kofi Annan obviously managed to cultivate pure autism and blindness as a tool to avoid any conflict with Washington. Nice try.

When it was already foreseeable at least six weeks ago that there would be a standoff over Iraq in the Security Council, the Nobel Peace Prize laureate Annan simply wasn't able or willing to act in the background and develop possible alternatives. "The Secretary General doesn`t interfere in the agenda of the Security Council," his office said. But sometimes it may be necessary for the Secretary General to position himself. Otherwise the United Nations will soon be seen as the new League of Nations and really become "irrelevant", as President Bush said.

Now Kofi Annan should take the chance to position himself one last time and step down in order to avoid the United Nations being another collateral damage of the war. He couldn't take a better step to strengthen his organisation.

 

This article is copyright 2003 Martin Schwarz, but permission is granted for reprint in print, email, blog, or web media on the condition that this credit text is included with the article.  Any commercial use (e.g. republishing on any page which contains advertising) requires the specific permission of the author.
original location http://inlet.org/essays/kofi.shtml

Martin writes in German. The original document including the German version is found here.

 

 

top | email | copyleft 2003

Hosting provided by UtiliGeek